Relapse of minimal change disease following the third mRNA COVID-19 vaccination: a case report and literature review.

Mass vaccination is the most important strategy to terminate the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Reports suggest the potential risk of the development of new-onset or relapse of minimal change disease (MCD) following COVID-19 vaccination; however, details on vaccine-associated MCD remain unclear. A 43-year-old man with MCD, who had been in remission for 29 years, developed nephrotic syndrome 4 days after receiving the third dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. His kidney biopsy revealed relapsing MCD. Intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy followed by oral prednisolone therapy was administered, and his proteinuria resolved within 3 weeks. This report highlights the importance of careful monitoring of proteinuria after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with MCD, even if the disease is stable and no adverse events occurred during previous vaccinations. Our case report and literature review of COVID-19 vaccine-associated MCD indicated that MCD relapse tends to occur later after vaccination and slightly more often following the second and subsequent vaccine doses than new-onset MCD.

Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Following Immunization With BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273: A Danish Population-Based Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the occurrence of sudden sensorineural hearing loss following immunization with BNT162b2 (Comirnaty®; Pfizer BioNTech) or mRNA-1273 (Spikevax®; Moderna) to the occurrence among unvaccinated individuals. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Nationwide Danish health care registers comprised all Danish residents living in Denmark on October 1, 2020, who were 18 years or older or turned 18 in 2021. METHODS: We compared the occurrence of sudden sensorineural hearing loss following immunization with BNT162b2 (Comirnaty®; Pfizer BioNTech) or mRNA-1273 (Spikevax®; Moderna) (first, second, or third dose) against unvaccinated person time. Secondary outcomes were a first-ever hospital diagnosis of vestibular neuritis and a hearing examination, by an ear-nose-throat (ENT) specialist, followed by a prescription of moderate to high-dose prednisolone. RESULTS: BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccine was not associated with an increased risk of receiving a discharge diagnosis of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.99, confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-1.64) or vestibular neuritis (adjusted HR: 0.94, CI: 0.69-1.24). We found a slightly increased risk (adjusted HR: 1.40, CI, 1.08-1.81) of initiating moderate to high-dose oral prednisolone following a visit to an ENT specialist within 21 days from receiving a messenger RNA (mRNA)-based Covid-19 vaccine. CONCLUSION: Our findings do not suggest an increased risk of sudden sensorineural hearing loss or vestibular neuritis following mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination. mRNA-Covid-19 vaccination may be associated with a small excess risk of a visit to an ENT specialist visit followed by a prescription of moderate to high doses of prednisolone.

Anti-hepatitis B surface antigen as a biomarker for immunity acquisition against SARS-CoV-2

Background: More than a year has passed since the first coronavirus vaccines were widely used. However, some healthcare workers are infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) despite full vaccination. The immune effect of SARSCoV- 2 vaccines attenuates in a few months in contrast to other universal vaccines, such as the hepatitis B vaccine, which have an immune effect that lasts for a longer time. In addition, the neutralizing antibody (Ab) titers can be measured only in limited medical institutions. In this study, we aimed to investigate the factors that predict SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers after vaccination. Method(s): In this study, we enrolled one thousand one hundred and thirty-three healthcare workers (826 women, 307 men) after second inoculation of the BNT162b2 vaccine (Pfizer /BioNTech) in February- April 2021. Medical checkups and self-reported questionnaires were used to collect medical histories and demographic characteristics. The Alinity SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant (Abbott) quantitative IgG spike protein serology assay was examined in a cohort of participants 1, 4, 6 months after the second vaccination, and 1 month after the third vaccination of the BNT162b vaccine. Lower Ab titers were defined under median at each time point. The relationships between SARS-CoV-2 infection and these factors were analyzed. Result(s): The mean observation period was four hundred and fortyeight days. The median titers at 1, 4, 6 months after the second vaccination were 9293 U/mL (interquartile range [IQR], 5840-14392 U/mL), 1658 U/mL (IQR, 999-2676) and 832 U/mL (IQR, 523-1300), respectively. The risk factors for lower Ab titers were age (60 years older, odds ratio [OR], 2.08), presence of current illness (OR 1.52), smoking habit (OR 2.36), and no fever after the second vaccination (OR 2.44). The median titers at 1 month after the third vaccination was 13780 U/mL (IQR, 9085-22722), and the risk factor for lower Ab titers was hepatitis B surface Ab (HBsAb) negative (OR 1.38). The total 1-year cumulative infection rate was 4.9%. The median infection period was three hundred and twenty days (IQR, 298-365) after the second vaccination. The risk factors of infection were age (30 s and 40 s), and HBsAb negative. The 1-year cumulative infection rate of 30-40 s and other ages were 6.6% and 3.7%, respectively (p<0.01). The 1-year cumulative infection rate of HBsAb negative participants with 30-40 s and other age were 7.7% and 4.9%, respectively (p = 0.064), while that of HBsAb positive participants with 30-40 s and other age were 6.7% and 1.7%, respectively (p<0.01). Conclusion(s): HBsAb and age can become prognostic factors to be infected with SARS-CoV-2 after vaccination. Especially, HBsAb negative people under 50 years old should pay attention to SARSCoV- 2 infection even after second vaccination.

Guillain-Barré Syndrome Following the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine

PURPOSE: The onset of the COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic in December 2019 created the need for multiple scientific research activities and clinical trials in an attempt to find solutions to mitigate the impact of the virus. One of the important tools to combat the virus is the development of vaccination programs. All types of vaccines have been associated with a mild to severe risk of neurological adverse events. One of these severe adverse events is Guillain-Barré syndrome. CASE REPORT: Here, we describe a case of Guillain-Barré syndrome after the first dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and review the literature to increase the current knowledge regarding this complication. CONCLUSION: Guillain-Barré syndrome after COVID-19 vaccination is responsive to treatment. The benefits of administering the vaccine outweigh the risks. Due to the negative impact of COVID-19, it is essential to recognize the development of neurological complications that are potentially associated with vaccination, including Guillain-Barré syndrome.

REAL-WORLD EFFECTIVENESS OF mRNA, SUBUNIT, AND VECTOR-BASED VACCINES AGAINST COVID-19

Background: Limited Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) studies address the mRNA, adenoviral vector-based, and protein subunit vaccines and their mix and match in real-world settings. BNT162v2 (Pfizer-BioNTech), mRNA- 1273 (Moderna), AZD1222 (AstraZeneca), and locally produced MVC-COV1901 (Medigen) are provided under the National Vaccination Program. Taiwan maintained a low circulation of Covid-19 infection until a major epidemic Omicron BA.2, began in April 2022. The study aimed to estimate the VE against moderate and severe (severity) and fatal diseases (death) associated with SARS-CoV-2 among individuals administered one, two, and three doses of vaccination and categorized by vaccine type combinations in this predominantly infection-naive population. Method(s): The study included CDC's administrative records from National Immunization Information System and National Infectious Disease Reporting System from March 21, 2021, to September 30, 2022. Criteria for Covid-19 severity followed WHO's guidelines, and the committee reviewed the records. The study calculated each individual's last administered date to disease onset (incidence rate (IR) per 100,000 person-days) to explore the incidence rate to compare the presence of risk probabilities. Multiple logistic regression was used for vaccine effectiveness analysis. Result(s): Of 23,933,482 individuals included in the study, and 6,202,496 infections, 30,976 severity, and 10,851 deaths were observed. Compared with three doses administered, three doses of AZD1222 or it as primary series plus mRNA or protein-based vaccines were at higher risk of severity (IR: 0.390-0.762), followed by mRNA-1273 (IR: 0.316-0.471), MVC-COV1901 (IR: 0.044-0.196) and BNT162v2 (IR: 0.061-0.197). As for the death outcome, AZD1222 was at higher fatal risk (IR: 0.127-0.269), followed by mRNA-1273 (IR: 0.086-0.125), MVC-COV1901 (IR: 0.013-0.064) and BNT162v2 (IR: 0.015-0.045). VE against the severity of AZD1222 or it as primary series ranged from 65.9% to 77.7%;mRNA vaccines ranged from 86.4% to 96.1%;and protein-based vaccines ranged from 91.4% to 96.2%. A similar pattern of VE against death ranged from 60.9% to 73.7%, 88.2% to 96.2%, and 90.3% to 95.6%. Conclusion(s): Individuals who received their primary series as AZD1222 might not have adequate protection against Covid-19 severity so encourage those vulnerable groups to receive additional booster doses. The study also indicated that protein subunit vaccines provide similar protection against severity and death as mRNA vaccines. (Table Presented).

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Findings of COVID-19 Vaccine-Associated Myopericarditis at Intermediate Follow Up: A Comparison with Classic Myocarditis.

OBJECTIVE: To report intermediate cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) findings of COVID-19 vaccine associated myopericarditis (C-VAM) and compare with classic myocarditis. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study including children diagnosed with C-VAM from 5/2021 through 12/2021 with early and intermediate CMR. Patients with classic myocarditis from 1/2015 through 12/2021 and intermediate CMR were included for comparison. RESULTS: There were 8 patients with C-VAM and 20 with classic myocarditis. Among those with C-VAM, CMR performed at median 3 days (IQR 3, 7) revealed 2/8 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)<55%, 7/7 patients receiving contrast with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and 5/8 patients with elevated native T1 values. Borderline T2 values suggestive of myocardial edema were present in 6/8. Follow-up CMRs performed at median 107 days (IQR 97, 177) showed normal ventricular systolic function, T1, and T2 values; 3/7 patients had LGE. At intermediate follow-up, C-VAM patients had fewer myocardial segments with LGE than classic myocarditis patients (4/119 vs 42/340, p=0.004). C-VAM patients also had a lower frequency of LGE (42.9 vs 75.0%) and lower percentage of LVEF<55% compared with classic myocarditis (0.0 vs 30.0%), although these differences were not statistically significant. Five classic myocarditis patients did not receive an early CMR, leading to some selection bias in study design. CONCLUSION: Patients with C-VAM had no evidence of active inflammation or ventricular dysfunction on intermediate CMR, although a minority had persistent LGE. Intermediate findings in C-VAM revealed less LGE burden compared with classic myocarditis.

Relationship Between Covid-19 And Donor Specific Antibodies In Orthotopic Heart Transplant Recipients

Introduction: De novo donor specific antibodies (DSAs) are associated with increased risk of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and worse prognosis in patients after orthotopic heart transplant (OHT). Viral infections have the potential to induce or reactivate the production of DSAs, yet the development of DSAs after infection by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has not been reported. In this observational study, we describe DSA titers after Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and relationship with AMR and graft dysfunction in a large OHT cohort at a tertiary academic medical center. Hypothesis: : We predicted that COVID-19 infection would be associated with development of de novo DSAs or increase in pre-existing DSAs. Method(s): We retrospectively analyzed all adult OHT patients followed at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis between 4/1/2020-12/31/2021. COVID-19 infection was defined by positive antigen or PCR test in setting of clinical exposure or symptoms. Patients were considered fully vaccinated 2 weeks after 2 doses of the BNT162b (Pfizer-BioNTech) or mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccines or after a single dose of the AD26.COV2.S (Johnson & Johnson) vaccine. De novo DSAs were defined as newly detected MHC I or II antibody greater than 2000 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) by single antigen beads or newly elevated antibody against angiotensin-II type 1 receptor (AT1R). In patients with pre-existing DSAs, a significant increase was defined by an MFI value that increased by 20% or more compared to their baseline value prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Result(s): A total of 577 patients were followed during the study period and 117 cases of COVID-19 infection were identified. Baseline characteristics of COVID-19 positive patients are shown in Figure. Overall, 10% of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 infection developed de novo DSAs or an increase in pre-existing DSAs, with unvaccinated patients having a higher incidence compared to vaccinated patients (15% vs. 2%, p=0.02). MHC class II-specific antibodies were the most common DSAs detected. There was a trend towards higher incidence of AMR in unvaccinated patients, although mortality and long-term graft dysfunction were similar. Conclusion(s): Unvaccinated patients had a higher incidence of developing de novo or an increase in pre-existing DSAs after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Future studies are necessary to investigate the long-term consequences of COVID-19 in the OHT population.Copyright © 2022

Immunogenicity, safety and efficacy in the CVID patients -Data from the 6-month prospective study

Background: A single-stranded mRNA virus SARS-CoV- 2 is associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome in the predisposed individuals such as elderly, obese, chronic cardiovascular or pulmonary diseases. Higher risk for severe course was also reported in inborn errors of immunity (IEI). While restriction measures play important role from the short-term perspective, vaccination may provide long-term protection. However, only limited data are available on safety and efficacy in immunocompromised patients with IEI such as Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID). Method(s): We assessed humoral and cellular responses, safety and efficacy in a cohort of 20 CVID patients after 2 doses of anti-SARS- CoV- 2 vaccine BNT162b. The humoral reponse was evaluated using ELISA and western blot methods, the T cell response measured by IFNg secretion functional assay. Adverse events were reported by Patient Clinical Questionnaire. Blood count, biochemical, coagulation and immunological parameters were checked before and after vaccination. The patients were followed for 6 months. Result(s): Despite severely impaired antibody production hunoral response was detected in 48% (n = 10/21) of patients at month 1. However, the response persisted in only 33% (n = 6/18) at month 3 and further decreaed to 13% (n = 2/15) at month 6. The T cell response was measurable in 5 patients (28%) at month 1. In total, 4 out of 20 (20%) patients got infected within the study period. None of them required oxygenotherapy or hospital admission. We did not observe any severe adverse effects beyond local pain, fatigue, headche, fever, arthralgia and myalgia. Conclusion(s): Vaccination with mRNA vaccine BNT162b provides safe and effective protection for a subgroup of CVID patients. However, the immunogenicity is lower compared to the general population.

Evaluation of patients with history of vaccine allergies prior to mRNA-based Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination

Background: During the initial rollout of COVID-19 vaccination in Singapore, the Ministry of Health (MOH) issued recommendations that patients with a history of any previous vaccine allergy be referred to an allergist for further review on suitability to proceed with mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines. We review the evaluation of these patients with suspected vaccine allergies prior to receiving mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines. Method(s): Between 8 April and 22 September 2021, 304 patients were evaluated prior to receiving the COVID-19 vaccinations. Of these, 63 (20.7%) patients with suspected immediate hypersensitivity reactions to non-COVID polysorbate-containing vaccines proceeded to have skin prick test (SPT) and Intradermal test (IDT) to polyethylene glycol (PEG)-3350, polysorbate 80 and polysorbate 20 containing products. Another 62 (20.4%) who reported delayed hypersensitivity reactions to polysorbate-containing vaccines proceeded to have direct inoculation (DI) of the Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine under the supervision of an allergist. The remaining 242 (76.6%) finally assessed not allergic polysorbate-or tolerated previous non-polysorbate- containing vaccines were recommended to proceed with COVID-19 vaccinations at the community vaccination sites. 99 patients in the SPT/IDT and DI group completed a questionnaire-based survey to report any post vaccination reactions. (Figure 1) Results: Of 63 patients who underwent SPT/IDT, 2 (3.2%) with equivocal IDT tolerated both doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine without major allergic reactions. 61 (6.8%) patients with negative SPT/IDT and 62 (100%) in the DI group completed both doses of BNT162b2 vaccination without major reactions. Among those who completed the questionnaire survey, 13 (13%) reported reactions including non-specific rashes and mild urticaria/angioedema post first dose vaccine. All subsequently completed the second dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine following allergist review;with 8 (61.5%) reporting similar mild skin reactions. Conclusion(s): Majority of those with suspected reactions to polysorbate containing vaccines are able to tolerate the BNT162n2 vaccine which contains PEG-2000. Skin tests prior to mRNA COVID-19 vaccination is unnecessary. Those who report mild potentially allergic reactions after the first dose are able to tolerate the second dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine.

evaluation of hematological abnormalities in subjects vaccinated with bnt162b2 in a longitudinal cohort of the coRe study

Background: Vaccination is considered the most effective preventive strategy to fight COVID-19. The aim of this study was to evaluate two critical concerns about: 1) the kinetic response of IgG and IgM, and: 2) the hematological abnormalities in a longitudinal cohort of health-care workers (HCW) who had received 2 doses of BNT162b2 mRNA-based vaccine. Method(s): Blood and nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from 46 volunteers' participants, previous written consensus, with presumable no symptoms of COVID-19. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) and M (IgM) and hematological parameters were examined. Multivariable mixed-effects models for repeated measure analysis were adopted to evaluate time changes in IgG, IgM and hematological parameters, and to investigate associations with vaccination response. Result(s): Forty-six subjects (N.=46;31.8% men;68.2% women;mean age near 36 years-old) were enrolled among healthcare workers of IRCCS MultiMedica (Milan, Italy). Overall, increase in serological IgG concentration appeared mainly between 21-28 days after the 1st dose, whereas IgM did not reach positivity in all cases. Mean blood cells counts were in normal range but we observed a significant reduction of total white blood cells and absolute lymphocyte counts after the 1st dose, persisting until the day 28. The increase of monocytes and neutrophils the day after the 1st dose subsequently decayed significantly. Eosinophils concentration showed a tendency to increase over time. Peripheral blood smear showed a growing frequency of atypical lymphocytes (lympho-variants), and of plasmacytoid forms, whereas no difference was found in large granular lymphocytes (LGL), although a decay after the boost was evident. The stratification of subjects, relative to the timing of IgG increase, showed the occurrence of 3 different patterns after vaccination, namely early-responders (R+), late-responders (R-) and pauci-responders (PR) with a peculiar kinetics of hematological parameters. Lymphocytes were significantly associated with total IgG: lower in R+ and PR compared to R- (P=0.0193 and P=00054, respectively). Conclusion(s): In healthy subjects, anti SARS-CoV-2 vaccination induced a variety of non-pathologic abnormalities. The response to vaccination was not equal in the groups examined. In PR group a major difference occurred with respect to R- and R+. This work adds novel insight into the puzzle of changes induced by SARS-CoV-2 virus.Copyright © 2022 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA.

Immunogenicity, effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccine in older adults living in nursing homes: A real-life study.

INTRODUCTION: BNT162b2 (BioNTech and Pfizer) is a nucleoside-modified mRNA vaccine that provides protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection and is generally well tolerated. However, data about its efficacy, immunogenicity and safety in people of old age or with underlying chronic conditions are scarce. PURPOSE: To describe BNT162b2 (BioNTech and Pfizer) COVID-19 vaccine immunogenicity, effectiveness and reactogenicity after complete vaccination (two doses), and immunogenicity and reactogenicity after one booster, in elders residing in nursing homes (NH) and healthy NH workers in real-life conditions. METHODS: Observational, ambispective, multicenter study. Older adults and health workers were recruited from three nursing homes of a private hospital corporation located in three Spanish cities. The primary vaccination was carried out between January and March 2021. The follow-up was 13 months. Humoral immunity, adverse events, SARS-CoV-2 infections, hospitalizations and deaths were evaluated. Cellular immunity was assessed in a participant subset. RESULTS: A total of 181 residents (mean age 84.1 years; 89.9% females, Charlson index ≥2: 45%) and 148 members of staff (mean age 45.2 years; 70.2% females) were surveyed (n:329). After primary vaccination of 327 participants, vaccine response in both groups was similar; ≈70% of participants, regardless of the group, had an antibody titer above the cut-off considered currently protective (260BAU/ml). This proportion increased significantly to ≈ 98% after the booster (p<0.0001 in both groups). Immunogenicity was largely determined by a prior history of COVID-19 infection. Twenty residents and 3 workers were tested for cellular immunity. There was evidence of cellular immunity after primary vaccination and after booster. During the study, one resident was hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2. No SARS-CoV-2-related deaths were reported and most adverse events were mild. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine is immunogenic, effective and safe in elderly NH residents with underlying chronic conditions.

Review on COVID-19 Vaccines

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak started in Wuhan, China when people started with the symptoms of respiratory disorder. The onset of this disease have symptoms like fever, dry cough, fatigue, and difficulty in breathing. The nature of SARS-CoV-2 seems highly contagious as it also can be spread with asymptomatically infected individuals. It has been more than a year which this outbreak have been announced as a pandemic by World Health Organization (WHO) due to major public health crisis and uncontrollable around the globe. Some countries have taken initiatives in inventing vaccines and step up in the clinical trial process since a vaccine is an all-powerful tool which it always been a saviour in fighting infectious disease. In searching for the vaccine, researchers had studied the previously published article of SARS-CoV or MERS as in the beginning, in light, there will be a suitable vaccine to fight this pandemic situation. Recent research on the vaccine has been tested to seek the right vaccine for COVID-19. This study is to focus on the current vaccine development against COVID-19 and to explore the potential vaccines' characteristics that have been studied by the previous proven research findings. This review was done based on the research articles and reviews published until the end of April 2021 through established scientific search engines and related scientific platforms based on the inclusion criteria with its related keywords like coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccine, clinical trials, and COVID-19 vaccine development. This review summarized a few vaccine candidates that have entered clinical trials and some supported evidence from Phase I until Phase III clinical trial studies that have been published and reported. In this review, 12 vaccine candidates have the potential to against SARS-CoV-2. Thus, their vaccine platform, characteristic as well as its efficacy studies have been discussed.Copyright © RJPT All right reserved.

Major Drugs Used in COVID-19 Treatment: Molecular Mechanisms, Vali-dation and Current Progress in Trials

Background: Currently, the present world is facing a new deadly challenge from a pandemic disease called COVID-19, which is caused by a coronavirus named SARS-CoV-2. To date, no drug or vaccine can treat COVID-19 completely, but some drugs have been used primarily, and they are in different stages of clinical trials. This review article discussed and compared those drugs which are running ahead in COVID-19 treatments. Method(s): We have explored PUBMED, SCOPUS, WEB OF SCIENCE, as well as press releases of WHO, NIH and FDA for articles related to COVID-19 and reviewed them. Result(s): Drugs like favipiravir, remdesivir, lopinavir/ritonavir, hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, ivermectin, corticosteroids and interferons have been found effective to some extent, and partially approved by FDA and WHO to treat COVID-19 at different levels. However, some of these drugs have been disapproved later, although clinical trials are going on. In parallel, plasma therapy has been found fruitful to some extent too, and a number of vaccine trials are going on. Conclusion(s): This review article discussed the epidemiologic and mechanistic characteristics of SARS-CoV-2, and how drugs could act on this virus with the comparative discussion on progress and drawbacks of major drugs used till date, which might be beneficial for choosing therapies against COVID-19 in different countries.Copyright © 2022 Bentham Science Publishers.

Immune thrombocytopenia and COVID-19 vaccination: Outcomes and comparisons to prepandemic patients.

Background: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) has been reported following COVID-19 vaccination. After index case fatalities, there was concern among patients both with and without a prior history of ITP in Australia. Objectives: To describe treatment outcomes of ITP after COVID-19 vaccination and compare relapsed vs historical pre-COVID-19 ITP cohorts. Methods: We collected ITP cases in Australia within 6 weeks of receiving any COVID-19 vaccination as part of primary vaccination (up to October 17, 2021). Second, we reviewed platelet charts in a historical ITP cohort to determine whether platelet variability was distinct from relapsed ITP after vaccination. Results: We report on 50 patients (37 de novo, 13 relapsed ITP) vaccinated from March 22, 2021, to October 17, 2021. Although there was 1 fatality, bleeding was otherwise mostly minor: (70% WHO bleeding grade <2). De novo ITP was more likely after AstraZeneca ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (89%) than Pfizer BNT162b2 (11%). Most patients responded quickly (median, 4 days; complete response, 40 of 45 [89%]). In the historical cohort, only 6 of 47 patients exhibited platelet variability (>50% decrease and platelets <100 × 109/L), but median platelet nadir was significantly higher than vaccination relapse (27 vs 6 × 109/L, P =.005). Conclusion: ITP was more frequently reported after AstraZeneca ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 than Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccination. Standard ITP treatments remain highly effective for de novo and relapsed ITP (96%). Although thrombocytopenia can be severe after vaccination, bleeding is usually mild. Despite some sampling bias, our data do not support a change in treatment strategies for patients with ITP after vaccination.

Safety Profile of Homologous and Heterologous Booster COVID-19 Vaccines in Physicians in Quito-Ecuador: A Cross-Sectional Study.

More than 600 healthcare workers died due to COVID-19 infection until January 2022 in Ecuador. Even though the COVID-19 vaccines are safe, local and systemic reactions were reported among physicians. This study aims to analyze the adverse events of COVID-19 with an emphasis on comparing the homologous and heterologous booster doses in physicians that received three approved vaccines in Ecuador. An electronic survey was performed in Quito, Ecuador, directed at physicians who were vaccinated with the three doses of COVID-19 vaccines. A total of 210 participants were analyzed after administering any dose of the vaccines. At least one AE was identified in 60.0% (126/210) of the sample after the first dose, 52.40% (110/210) after the second dose, and 75.2% (158/210) after the booster dose. The most frequent AEs were localized pain, myalgia, headache, and fever. At least one drug was used in 44.3% of the population after the first dose, 37.1% after the second dose, and 63.8% in the booster dose. Heterologous booster produces more AEs compared with homologous booster (80.1% vs. 53.8%), and 77.3% of participants reported that interfered with daily activities. Similar studies agree that reactogenicity occurs mainly with heterologous vaccination compared to homologous vaccination. This situation affected physicians' performance in daily activities and led them to use medication for the symptoms. In the future, it is recommended to perform cohort studies, where adverse events that are associated with vaccine boosters in the general population can be analyzed longitudinally, thus improving the level of evidence of the results.

Safety of and antibody response to the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine in adolescents and young adults with underlying disease

Background: Data are limited regarding the safety of and antibody response to the BNT162b2 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) messenger ribonucleic acid vaccine in adolescents and young adults with underlying disease. Methods: This prospective observational study enrolled patients age 12–25 years with chronic underlying disease who received 2 doses of BNT162b2. A 18-item questionnaire was used to assess adverse events within 7 days post-vaccination, and data regarding severe adverse events were collected from electronic medical records. An antibody titer for the receptor-binding domain of the spike protein in SARS-CoV-2 was used to assess antibody response after the second vaccine dose. Results: Study participants were 429 patients (241 [56.2%] age 12–15 years;188 [43.8%] age 16–25 years). The most common underlying diseases were genetic or chromosomal abnormalities and/or congenital anomalies, followed by endocrine or metabolic diseases;32% of participants were immunocompromised. Severe adverse events were observed after the second dose in 1 (0.4%) patient age 12–15 years and in 2 (1.1%) patients age 16–25 years;all patients recovered. Seropositivity after the second vaccine dose was 99.0%. The geometric mean antibody titer was higher in patients age 12–15 years versus 16–25 years (1603.3 [1321.8–1944.7] U/mL vs. 949.4 [744.2–1211.0] U/mL). Compared with immunocompetent patients, immunocompromised patients had a lower antibody titer (2106.8 [1917.5–2314.7] U/mL vs. 467.9 [324.4–674.8] U/mL). Conclusions: Vaccination with BNT162b2 was acceptably safe and immunogenic for adolescents and young adults with underlying disease. © 2022 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases

Patients with B-cell malignancies experience reduced antibody responses with class switching defect following BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccination

Vaccines having aided in escaping the majority of the population from immunological naïvety, our strategies are now shifting towards an increased focus on identifying and protecting the extremely vulnerable. We here describe the results of testing 12 patients, those with lymphoid malignancies having been targeted their B-cells for therapy with rituximab-containing regimens or a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, for anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies after receiving the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine doses. The interval from last dosing of B-cell depletion therapy to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was at median 5.3 (range 3.1–6.6) months. Using the ‘seroprotection' threshold of 775 [BAU/mL] for the anti-spike antibody titer, our finding points out the crucial unresponsiveness of the targeted population with 0/12 (0%) achieving ‘seroprotection'. Although IgG seroconversion was observed in 4/12 (33%), supporting the overall benefit of vaccination, the figures still point out a potential need for optimization of practice. IgA was further less responsive (unsuccessful ‘seroconversion' in 11/12 (92%)), implicating an underlying class switch defect. Those with depletion on B-cells are caught at a dilemma between, being too early and too late on receiving SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. They wish to get over their immunological naïvety at the earliest, while, in order to assure quality immune memory, are also required to hold the patience for their B-cells to repopulate. Although it remains an issue whether intensified vaccine schedules and/or regimens will lead to stronger immunogenicity or more effective boosters for non-responders, we shall take advantage of every increasing evidence in order to optimize current options. © 2022 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases

Examining the association between vaccine reactogenicity and antibody titer dynamics after the third dose of BNT162b2 vaccine using a mixed-effects model

Background: To mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries have recommended the use of booster vaccinations. The relationship between the degree of adverse vaccine reactions and elevated antibody titers is of interest;however, no studies have investigated the temporal changes in antibody titers based on repeated measurements after a third dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine. Methods: This prospective longitudinal cohort study was conducted with 62 healthcare workers who received a third dose of the BNT162b2 at Okayama University Hospital, Japan. Venous blood draw and fingertip whole blood test sample collection were conducted at the early (3–13 days) and 1-month time points;only FWT sample collection was conducted at the 2-month time point. Information on adverse reactions within 1 week after vaccination was also obtained. The association between fever of 37.5 °C or higher and antibody titers after the third dose of BNT162b2 was examined using a mixed-effects model and Poisson regression with robust variance. Results: A trend toward higher antibody titers in the early period after vaccination was observed in the febrile individuals, but the differences were not significant at 1 and 2 months post-vaccination (the partial regression coefficient for fever was 8094.3 [-1910.2, 18,098.8] at 1 month after vaccination, and 1764.1 [-4133.9, 7662.1] at 2 months after vaccination in the adjusted models). Conclusion: The findings suggest that the presence of fever after the third vaccine does not predict a sustained elevation in serum antibody titers. © 2022 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases

Humoral and T-cell response 12 months after the first BNT162b2 vaccination in solid organ transplant recipients and controls: Kinetics, associated factors, and role of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Introduction: We investigated humoral and T-cell responses within 12 months after first BNT162b2 vaccine in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients and controls who had received at least three vaccine doses. Furthermore, we compared the immune response in participants with and without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: We included adult liver, lung, and kidney transplant recipients, and controls were selected from a parallel cohort of healthcare workers. Results: At 12th-month, the IgG geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) (P<0.001), IgA GMCs (P=0.003), and median IFN-γ (P<0.001) were lower in SOT recipients than in controls. However, in SOT recipients and controls with previous infection, the neutralizing index was 99%, and the IgG, and IgA responses were comparable. After adjustment, female-sex (aOR: 3.6, P<0.009), kidney (aOR: 7.0, P= 0.008) or lung transplantation (aOR: 7.5, P= 0.014), and use of mycophenolate (aOR: 5.2, P=0.03) were associated with low IgG non response. Age (OR:1.4, P=0.038), time from transplantation to first vaccine (OR: 0.45, P<0.035), and previous SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR: 0.14, P<0.001), were associated with low IgA non response. Diabetes (OR:2.4, P=0.044) was associated with T-cell non response. Conclusion: In conclusion, humoral and T-cell responses were inferior in SOT recipients without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection but comparable to controls in SOT recipients with previous infection.